-
Re: BP Size
it will work someway.
they cant i2h. they cant use castle teleporter.
i believe current bp size designed for many many many big big big active people like 2~3k online people not 150 online+afk+market people.
-
Re: BP Size
Doesn’t change anything. As long as there is 1 bbq player in any group, the server will zerg them lol. Can’t blame them for trying to defeat a God. Pledges right now aren’t as big as sonoftonydanzas was, imagine 80% of nocap guys and at least half of the guys in zerg + CBAL all in one bp. Even when that entire bp broke into 2 or 3 diff groups, still zerged. It is what it is lol, people will do what it takes to try to beat people they could never beat from previous servers. Babyb and them has been struggling since 2017, when I started to play lineage again, kid has not killed me once in 3 years almost but died to me consistently LUL
-
Re: BP Size
I dont think a bp cap would help because people will fight with who they like to regardless if they're in bp or not. The only thing that it would stop is the amount of immunes/support that each player will get due to lack of mages/elves etc...And even if it was to happen, there is no PVP on the server to begin with...so why would any of these people in big bps right now avoiding pvp want to come and pvp at siege anyways? There's literally no incentive to go to siege unless you go for the pvp OR farm L4 which only 2 bps do at the moment.
If your going to implement a member size cap, make it so that castle is actually worth going for no matter what point in the game your at.
(example: Higher tax money, higher toi floor teleports, direct lower 10th floor TOI teleports) Something that will make people actually want it for themselves instead of letting "allies" have it. It might even open the door to smaller bps who claim "they dont have enough people to be competitive in pvp" like KeepersofDestiny from actually doing something in the game other than farming TOI because it would actually be useful to them.
Also, I don't see how you can argue that CBAL "balances" the server, when all they do is join the somewhat even bp numbers and tip the scales. (18v21 turns into 18vs27). Same thing has happened ever since I joined the server. At the start there was BLASTER who was already a massive bp who outnumbered everyone but yet CBAL took their side and allied them...Even to this day, when NOCAP has close to even numbers with ZERG, CBAL will still side with them. I dont understand this narrative that CBAL "is the balance of the server"... can someone explain pls -
Re: BP Size
CBAL is not balancing anything. When numbers are close to even between the two opposing pledges (ZERG and NOCAP) they fight against ZERG with NOCAP not caring about the actual balance of the siege. If they did they would be fighting like BBQ once did when virus and them were still playing. CBAL is not capable or skilled enough to fight 2 different sides at once like BBQ.
-
Re: BP Size
"You goal and focus was on PVP? When did that start because I remember a totally different server. I remember NOCAP and CBAL dodging pvp at all times in the hope of starving BBQ. Pledge size wasnt a problem then when you had 750members to actively hide vs 8 people...whys it a problem now?"
Virus, did you want to sober up and try that one again or am I to understand you lack the aptitude to determine that I was in support of leaving things as is and letting the community settle the balance? I'm guessing the latter.
Spiderman, for someone who has no affiliation with BBQ/Zerg, you sure have a lot to say about their enemies and your lips locked firmly around their... you know ;)
-
Re: BP Size
I was in NOCAP right before they gave Brandon access to prince and joined everyone. Now I just play randomly with no pledge. I like to watch the sieges so I know exactly what happens. I watched last siege it was 20 nocap vs 12 Zerg that's CBAL still joined the zerging per usual
-
Re: BP Size
BP cap won't fix anything. Its already mutliple pledges vs 1. it'll just benefit the bigger alliance then it will with the smaller bp like mine, it'll disable immune for smaller pledges who is fighting everyone. the pvp has always been one sided like this to even have this discussion, it's always cbal nocap side that has the most vs the smallest, so idk why this would even b an issue like people claim it is lol.
here's some stats from today's siege: was 39 vs 17 (not complaining, i like getting zerged been fighting a zerg since day 1). just giving my opinion/facts about this topic and why a bp cap will not fix or change anything lol.
Service alliance totaling 39 - CBAL (11), KOD (10), NOCAP (17), XTREMEPINOYZ (1)
ZERG alliance totaling 17 - ZERG (16), Calvin (1)
and 1 spectator.
2x the numbers+, and people won't even make it a 3 way.
let's end this bp cap topic and just let bp size stay :)o
-
Re: BP Size
Correct, and this is even with CBAL/NOCAP trading the castle last night LOL
Now it's CBAL/NOBALs/KeepersOfDestiny running as 1 bp alliance. I see no reason to force a BP cap just keep it as it is and we'll keep beating their asses as we normally do. Funny how everyone called us the "Zerg" so we named ourselves that but check reports and you'll see we're always the lesser lol. Even the siege charles let slide cause nocap didn't show up and tower was broken we didn't have an overwhelming force then. CBAL brought like 8 and KoD brought 5.... they were still even but didn't wanna fight without 10 more players? Keep it up. We're enjoying the feed.-Yoshi