-
BP Size
Add a custom royal/cha divisor to reduce the size of BP's on this server. The server is too small to have large BP's, there is no repurcussion for poor behavior by a bp.
-
Re: BP Size
Try joining another BP that is big enough to fight back, or making another bp big enough. BP sizes won't change anything, if players want to play together they will do it in smaller BPs. Look at CBAL and NOCAP.
-
Re: BP Size
Yeah, I pretty much arrived at the idea that it wouldn't make any difference. Might have been helpful if implemented from the get go.
-
Re: BP Size
When Zerg started growing to a ridiculous size, I honestly saw it as a potential threat to the stability of the server but I'm gonna have to concede on that and go back to the philosophy that when left alone, players will naturally maintain a balance on their own. Capping a blood pledge to 15 wouldn't have much of an impact on my pledge and while it might impact others, zerg players will find ways to adapt with multiple pledges. I think the bottom line is when faced with overwhelming odds, everything "usually" tends to work itself out on it's own and efforts to either babysit specific players/pledges and/or change the mechanics to discourage certain types of behavior might have more adverse effects on the server's stability than do it any actual good.
-
Re: BP Size
I would actually agree with this idea. not at the 15 level, but maybe like the cha x3 lvl. Seeing how the two things for cha on royals is pets/pledge members.
The Cha x 5 really is too much for a server of this size. You could own half the population on a server like this and still not reach that cap.
Only a few pledges can sustain themselves with the current giant cap. Having a diversity of pledges could be a good thing for a private server.
-
Re: BP Size
I'm guessing none of you actually play a royal thats why you think this way... Make and play a royal then you can complain about their bp size... NOCAP/CBAL teamed up.. you can do the same lol There's 1 active royal on this server that owns a BP it's Peach make your own active royal/BP
-Yoshi
-
Re: BP Size
Maining a level 6X royal doesn't grant anyone more or less of a say at the table when it comes to determining when or when not to cap. This is an issue that affects everyone so I think it's safe to say we can disregard that last comment and absolutely everyone should feel free to provide feedback. I'm still sticking with the school of thought that adjusting the mechanics of the game to deal with the politics of the server can have adverse effects. If someone has a lot of free time on their hands and decides to absorb as many weaker pledges as they can to troll the server, the community will naturally respond. I originally thought it would be a good idea to cap pledges at 15 because of how small/fragile the community was but I don't think that solves anything permanently. Having a massive zerg pledge has it's setbacks without having to adjust anything. There's going to be drama and internal conflict at the least and then there's the issue of trying to herd cats and keep your stragglers from feeding the enemy.
The mechanics of siege were already adjusted to prevent tower ninja's from taking castle at the last minute so if anything should be adjusted, that's the place to start. Make kills at siege carry more weight than protecting the tower. This takes the advantage away from those who mass recruit to have an advantage over their enemies and gives it to the pledges who instead have more focus on maintaining and streamlining an effecient crew.
-
Re: BP Size
Lol... BP size makes no difference... CBAL and NOCAP are the same bp in 2 BP's don't try say my comment carries no weight... Feel free to leave opinions... but be someone that actually plays a royal... someone that uses it daily.... someone that brings it to fights and uses it and knows the struggles... You've already pointed out 1 fact, large BP's are at a disadvantage so there's no point to limit them To say that the level a royal is has any affect is mind boggling... at level 6x royal participates more in sieges and fights than any other as the leader of the fight... I think it's fair to say my opinions counts the same if not more... Thx though for your opinion it was read but I am the only PvP royal and worth more points at siege than anyone lol... Allow me to have sacrificial lambs.. you just enjoy killing them,
-Yoshi
-
Re: BP Size
Yes, I understand and appreciate you believe you deserve praise for maining a level 6x royal. Our royal is 7x and I don't believe that gives us any more or less weight on an issue that effects everyone. If I wanted to take it a step further, I could also point out the fact that you are a perfect example of a pledge that was absorbed into the zerg to troll the server. Before this you had no real pvp experience, albeit Giran DM at 8pm or the handful of times you showed up to help blaster when there wasn't really much fighting going on. That said, I still believe you and everyone else should have some feedback on this. Also, on the issue of our relationship with NOCAP, call it what you want. Our goal and focus has always been on pvp and balance. When your pledge sat in town on Saturday because you didn't want to face greater numbers, we started fighting NOCAP just as we do outside siege. Saying we might as well be the same pledge is either an expression of anger on your part or perhaps an indicator of low aptitude. In any case, I'm not interested in having a debate with you becuase it's honestly not going to give me any gratification and it's not going to help you make your case. I'd suggest sticking to the subject and providing feedback that doesn't serve to pat yourself on the back or throw shade at your enemies.
-
Re: BP Size
From a neutral point of view.
No one BP on this server was ever balancing the server, you guys obviously taking the word balancing out of context. Just look at the current siege reports. There has been close to equal amount of players in NOCAP vs ZERG, when i watch sieges on my alt, CBAL and NOCAP would group up to fight ZERG. How is this balancing when numbers are close to equal but you guys throw 8-9 people in the rapid fire causing it one side to have 1 party more then the others? Zerging a group is not balancing anything.
Only BP in the history of this server that was close to balancing was BBQ. They faught the server with a small bp, I’ve seen them faught 2vs40 and 8vs40 live and on princess’ spammed YouTube post. When it was BLASTER CBAL vs NOCAP, BBQ faught them battle royale style. Only small bp here ever to fight everyone with a small crew was BBQ, I have personally never seen CBAL done this.
-
Re: BP Size
So basically you're not interested in providing useful feedback on BP size or adjusting game mechanics but would rather use this as a platform to trash talk your enemies, pat yourelves on the back and give praise to the guys who mass recruited you to troll the server. I'm not exactly sure how that's at all useful in this discussion but if I understood that, I'd probably also understand why someone would set their standards so low that they'd allow themselves to be used by a person(s) to troll the server as long as it gave them hope of being on what they think is the winning team. I'm not delusional enough to think I'm going to beat a skunk in a stinking match so I'll leave you to it.
-
Re: BP Size
" Before this you had no real pvp experience, albeit Giran DM at 8pm or the handful of times you showed up to help blaster when there wasn't really much fighting going on."
Falq and I fought 2v10 keeping entire bp's out of siege zone... You're only here to throw shade and pretend like you fight... I've been the only player to not miss a siege since I was asked to merge... I was pvp'in before this... I tried to be nuetral but learned that's not possible.. it's a "pick a side" game... you picked NOCAP as the other guy pointed out... So don't say that we throw shade when that's all you've tried to do... talking about your level 7x royal that you power leveled in GP and don't actually play lol... you're like Tesla, leveled a royal and only play it to take castle... I stay on my royal at siege and fight with it... please don't try to shade me just cause you're bored with the game and quit man. Play and help the server. Thx. This game isn't designed to be balanced... it's designed to be zerged and counter zerged... that's how it is. if you want it different then there needs to be some give for that take... If a larger bp needs to be split then so do the smaller bp's...-Yoshi
-
Re: BP Size
That wasn’t trolling and you’re not my enemy. I don’t fight anyone, people just pks me.
My whole response is bp size related, it doesn’t help with a bp cap. It’s already pretty even as a bp vs bp if you check siege reports. If there’s a cap you are trying to just balance out the numbers of players vs players, am i correct? It wouldn’t change much cause numbers are pretty even right now.
You claim CBAL to be balancing and I’m responding to your claim by indicating to you that numbers has been close to even NOCAP vs ZERG, adding CBAL’s party in the line does exactly the opposite as you claim as balancing.
Providing my feedback that BBQ was the only bp out there to be close to balancing since they faught the whole server or joined fights in a battle royale style is not trash talking.
Anyone whose played this server since the start, knows that BBQ was the smallest bp out there and only BP to fight everyone. No matter how big of a cunt they are on global and their coi ganks, I can’t disagree that they did more balancing then any bp here claims to do, since they never explicitly helped any BP just to zerg. I have seen them 8vs 20 vs20 they don’t join in one side in a 20vs20 like CBAL does. BBQ would fight any and everyone, CBAL doesn’t. This is my point of view along with others in my neutral bp. Doesn’t take a genius to see this.
-
Re: BP Size
Nope won’t work LUL
-
Re: BP Size
You goal and focus was on PVP? When did that start because I remember a totally different server. I remember NOCAP and CBAL dodging pvp at all times in the hope of starving BBQ. Pledge size wasnt a problem then when you had 750members to actively hide vs 8 people...whys it a problem now?